Underneath my yellow skin

Tag Archives: manipulation

The difference between can’t and won’t

My mother and I have a fraught relationship to say the least. We actually don’t have a relationship to speak of, but that’s not what she would  say. She wants us to be close because mother/daughter, blah blah blah. As you can probably tell, I don’t give a shit about that. Here’s the thing. I am not anti-mother/daaughter. I’m anti-prescriptive roles based on gender. Actually, I’m anti-prescriptive roles based on anything.

I’ve mentioned before that I’m libertarian with a small ‘l’. Basically, I’m for whatever you (general you and specific you) want to do as long as it doesn’t harm others. It’s interesting because at Ask A Manager, there is so much talk about what is normal in terms of at work. That differs for different industries and companies, of course, but there are some general things–like wearing pants at work, for example. It’s pretty universal for all blue-collar and white-collar jobs.

You start getting into heated debates when you branch out from there. Like bras. Do they need to be worn at work? Depressingly, many women seem to think so. There was a letter at AAM about someone whose…coworker? Intern? One of those built a blanket fort at work. The letter writer wanted to know how to address this with the…new hire. That’s what it was. The letter writer wanted to know how to talk with the intern about not doing this. Alison gave a great response about how she would want thing s to be and how they actually are. She said while theoretically there was no reason the new hire shouldn’t work from a blanket fort, well, it would be viewed as strange in most offices.

This is assuming there’s no medical reason for it. But it underlines the silliness of professional norms. I do all my work from my couch. I’m lying on it with my back propped up on one arm and my keyboard on my lap. The laptop itself is sitting on the coffee table. My cat is sleeping on my legs. This is how I type most days.

I did not read all 500+ comments, but there were several who were sympathetic to the new hire. And pointed out that it might eb a medical thing. I didn’t expect to find so many people pro-pillow fort, but it was heartwarming. I am pro-pillow fort myself, obviously. However, in reading more of the comments, there were plenty disparaging ones, too, including one who said she would consider firing the new hire for being so far out of the norm.

I mean…fire her? Come on. How are people supposed to just intuit business norms if they had never been in an office before? This was her first job post college, and we just went through a pandemic. It was very possible that she had never been in an office situation. Why would you even consider firing her without talking to her first? The letter writer hadn’t seen the fort for themselves, which was the first step they were going to take.

I think the bottom line is how comfortable you feel going against the grain. As several people pointed out, someone in her first job wasn’t goingto have the political capital needed to be the weird one. That comes with seniority, ounfortunately.


Continue Reading

Ignorance, Lies, and Facepalms

who's manipulating my strings?
I see the resemblance….

If I were to tell you that this president knowingly hired someone as his national security adviser who was in secrets talks with Russia during the election, someone who promised quid pro quo with top Russian officials if Trump were elected, would you believe me? What if I told you the exact same scenario, but that the president did it unwittingly? Would you believe me? What if I told you he was warned that the perspective National Security Adviser General Michael Flynn might be susceptible to blackmail from the Russians by  the acting Attorney General Sally Yates, the same woman he later fired for insubordination because she refused to uphold his Muslim ban? Would you still believe me? What if I then told you that this president didn’t read the reports on this topic? Would you believe that?

I’m throwing all these ‘what ifs’ at you because the basic story is true, but no one knows exactly what this president did or didn’t know about it. He and his aides have changed the story as is their wont, and it’s easy to believe any of the aforementioned scenarios. That’s the most disturbing thing to me: this president is so corrupt, ignorant, inept, and venal, it’s hard to discern which of the negative explanations is the correct one. My opinion is that he was told about Flynn at the time, but he either didn’t care or didn’t retain the knowledge.

Side note: I want this president to take a reading test, and I want him to do it in public. I know it’s not going to happen, but more than one person I know has wondered if this president can actually read. My response is: He’s probably functionally literate, but just barely. More to the point, he evinces no interest in reading, which automatically makes him suspect to me. But again, it’s equally possible that he can read at a high level and just doesn’t care to do so. He’s proven that he’s incurious about the world around him and anything that doesn’t reflect what he already thinks. I seriously cannot see him picking up, say, Toni Morrison and giving her a serious read.

To my questions above, I think it’s equally possible that he knew exactly what was happening and didn’t care, and that he was given all the information but either didn’t read it or didn’t retain it because it didn’t interest him. My brother asked me if this president was a rightwinger. I said I didn’t think he was especially so. My brother followed it up with, “Then why has he chosen so many rightwingers?” I was stumped for a second, but I quickly rallied. My guess is that some of the names had been given to him by his aides or Republicans in Congress, some are friends of his, some are quid pro quo from his campaign, and some are sucker-uppers who flattered this president into giving them a plum position.

Continue Reading