I rolled credits on Murders on the Yangtze River (OMEGAMES STUDIO) after fifteen hours, and it was mostly a fun ride. I talked about the demo in this post, which was the first two chapters of the game. That took roughly three hours–maybe four? The rest of the game is four more chapters, which is six in total. So given how long the game took me to complete, that’s just under four hours per chapter. Let’s remember that I talk at least twice as long as other people do to finish a game, so I think we can safely say that most people can finish it in seven or eight hours.
I mentioned my biggest gripe about the game in the last post I wrote about my perfect detective game. It’s the super-shitty get through the maze to escape the giant maw of your dead father who is trying to devour you.
In the last chappter of the game, there’s another shitty gameplay section in which I, playing as Afu (Shen Chung-ping’s assistant), have to sneak around the police station at night. At least that one saves after every floor climbed. But my god, it was tedious and really had no need to be in the game.
I think that’s my biggest problem with the game. There are way too many different ways of solving the cases that could just be lumped together. And the logic doesn’t always logic. I’ll get to the latter in a bit, but I’d like to focus on the former for now.
I want to stress that I know this game takes a lot of its inspiration from the Ace Attorney games. It’s very clear that the DNA of this game is that series. I did not like those games when I tried them out for a few reasons. One is the hamminess of the games. Two is because of the ridicilousness of the logic.
In this game, I really think they could have benefited from paring back on the different kinds of deductions. I’ve included a gameplay trailer below to show the different things you can do in the game. There’s investigating the crime scene (fine), talking to witnesses (fine), looking at the surrounding environments (fine), and then there’s the bunch of things that sound so damn similiar. These aren’t the actual names, but there’s interrogation, debate, finding inconsistencies in evidence, and a bunch of others. I don’t understand why they can’t just lump them together.