Underneath my yellow skin

Tag Archives: acceptance

More thoughts on family, dysfunction, and letting go

I’ve been talking in the past several posts about my family, and here is something I rarely admit out loud. One of the reasons I get so frustrated when my mother goes down the negativity route is becuase it echoes the monkey chatter in my brain as well. I can ‘what if’ until the cows come home, and it makes it so it’s really difficult for me to make an actual decision about anything important.

When I was in my twenties, K and I talked about how different our mothers were. Her mother was very much a ‘things will work out, no matter what’ kind of person, whereas my mother had a ‘something will always go drastically wrong, no matter what’ mentality. This came out when K was taking me to the airport and joking about me having a roll of quarters, an umbrella, and a bunch of other things she thought unnecessary. I said you never knew what you might need when you were on vacation.

Years later, I realized t hat as long as I had proper Id and my credit card, I could buy anything I needed. A huge privilege, yes, and not something I wanted to abuse, but it really eased the anxious part of my brain.

That’s something I learned in my twenties/early thirties. I had to find ways to work around the destructive chatter in my brain. I had to build that into everything I did because it was just a part of me. It makes it harder for me to do things, but I’ve gotten better in the last few years. In some ways. In other ways, it’s gotten worse.

K and I talked about the pros and cons to our mothers’ ways of thinking. With K’s mother, a pro was that she did not have to expend too much energy on ‘what ifs?’. She assumed things would turn out ok, and that must have been a relief. On the other hand, when things didn’t turn out ok, she was ill-equipped to deal with it.

Whtereas with my mother’s Debbie Downer mentality meant that she was always prepared for the worst, but didn’t know what to do if things did not reach that point. In addition, in always looking at the negative side of things, it paralyzes her from actually making decisions because any choice seems bad.

This is what I hate the most because it’s how I deal with things as well. I can see a million things that could possibly go wrong at any given time, and I can’t see a way forward. Rationally, I know that every decision has consequences, both good and bad. I know that there is no choice that is completely positive.

And yet. My brain equates negative consequences with catastrophe, and then I can’t make any choice at all. I have to consciously push my way past that mental barrier in order to make a decision.


Continue Reading

Taiji–loving something that actually loves me back

More about Taiji (and maybe Bagua. We’ll see). In yesterday’s post, I highlighted some of the differences between Taiji and Bagua. Today, I want to talk about my love for Taiji because I can. And because it’s deep. And it’s one thing I love that actually loves me back. I’m not talking about people–there are people I love who love me backI’m talking about hobbies/things. And I mean love in a looser sense, not actual, sentient love.

For example, I love FromSoft games (and have made that very clear), but they do not love me back. Ian has said that he thinks I’m the perfect recipient for the games (the average player who tries really hard), but I disagree. The games are brutal, despite the current retconning by From lovers to deny this. The recent meta in soulslikes is to make parry king, which is so not my jam at all. It’s also ironic because FromSoft themselves have moved away from the parry. In Elden Ring, they added a guarded counter that works the same as a parry (allows you to do a riposte), and is oodles easier than a parry.

I have known for some time that the FromSoft games would outpace me at some point, and I fear that we are at that point. The last boss of the last DLC of Dark Souls III pushed me to my limit. and I don’t want to even talk about Sekiro. Yes, I beat the final boss of that game, but I knew that it was at the very top of my skill ability, if not past it. I cheesed that boss by running around in circles and waiting for one particular move by the boss.

You have to know that this boss has *spoilers* four phases. The first phase is Genichiro, whom you fight earlier. Twice. Once in the very beginning when he slices off your arm (or not. You can avoid it if you’re really good. I don’t think I got a single hit on him the first time I fought him), and then once about a fourth of the way in (or later depending on what you do), there’s an epic battle on top of Ashina Castle. It’s supposed to be a hard skills check, and boy, was it ever.

In this fight, the Genechiro phase is fairly easy (in comparison to what comes next), but I realized after several attempts that if I had to use a…ah, gourd during this phase, it was better to let him kill me and try again.  I had to make it to Isshin, the Sword Saint, with all my gourds to have any chance of beating him.

As I said, I had no hope of actually beating him with my skills, so I raced around in circles in the arena, baiting out one attack. When he did that attack, I would hit him twice, and then resume running around. For three phases. Whilst having to dodge ever-increasingly difficult attacks by Isshin. If you can deflect properly, the fight can take a minute or two. Because I could not deflect, it took me fifteen minutes to beat him. And if I went back to do it again, I would lose to him another hundred times, I’m sure.


Continue Reading

Beautiful, flaws and all

In yesterday’s post, I was writing about flaws and positive attributes, then I wandered off the road as I tend to do. My main point was that we all have flaws. It’s part of being human. Think of how boring we would be if we didn’t.

There are flaws I have that I know I’m not going to change. Such as working to the back of a deadline. I will get an assignment/task done on time. However, I will get it done at the last minute possible. I do admire people who are able to do a task as soon as they get it (like pay a bill before that was all automated), but that’s not me. It caused me a lot of stress in college. Not because I didn’t get my assigments turned in on time; I did. But because I would waste the whole time before the deadline stressing about it.

I had a class in which the only grade for the whole semester was one paper at the end of said semester. That’s not entirely true. We were also graded on class participation, but that was maybe a quarter of the grade. Most of it was on one paper. The class was Psychology Through Biography. The assignment was to pick a person and write an analysis of their psychology. The professor was an older man who was very close to retirement and clearly could not give a fuck about the class. I liked him, but he was definitely a crotchety old man.

I chose Tina Turner after much consternation. I wanted to do an Asian women, but there were none of note at the time. Or rather, none for whom I could find enough resources to base a seventy-plus paper on. I also thought about seeing if I could interview a murderer–let me explain. At the time, there was a young black man (who went to my high school, by the way, when I did) who killed a gay senator and another gay man–and he wrote a manifesto about how much he hated gay men for spreading AIDS. He believed he had it himself, but it was never proven if he did or not (the fact that he’s sitting in a jail cell decades later says, probably not). He had been a student at Bethel College, a very Christian college, and he was clearly troubled. He had not shown that in high school, but he was strange–and that’s not me saying taht in retrospect.

I wanted to interview him, but I could not swing that, obviously. I decided Tina Turner would be an interesting case study because of her tragic history, but also because she was a woman of color in a time when that was not acceptable. More to the point, she was clearly sexual and had no qualms about showcasing t hat. Now, a conscientious student would have started researching in a month or so, then written the paper over the semester. I was not that conscientious student. I was and am very smart. Learning is easy for me, for the most part. This is both a blessing and a curse. It’s a blessing for obvious reasons, but it’s a curse because I rest on my laurels. I’m trying to not say I’m sazy so much, but, well, it’s not far from wrong.


Continue Reading

The harsh reality of ‘but faaaamily’

I have been thinking a lot about my mother lately because her calls of desperation have come more frequently–almost once a week. Every phone call follows the same pattern. She asks me how I’m doing, then brushes over any response other than ‘fine’. This is not unusual for her. She doesn’t really care how I am; she just knows she has to ask. In the past, if I mentioned I had a cold or something like that, she would have to counter with why she had it worse. It would frustrate me, and then I would quietly seethe for the rest of the conversation.

Now, if I even so much as cough, she jumps on it because of my recent medical crisis. I have to declare that I’m fine, it’s just allergies, or whatever so she won’t go off the rails. She either overreacts to my ailments or underreacts. There is no just right in this case, and I’m pretty sure it’s because she’s a narcissist. She’s learned that she SHOULD care about other people, but she doesn’t know how to do it.

She’s mentioned a couple of times recently that she thinks she might be autistic because she’s an introvert. I told her she wasn’t, at least not for that reason (because autistic does not equal introvert), but the lack of emotions part, maybe.

However, I would diagnose her as a narcissist rather than autistic, which I have done in my own head. It has really helped me deal with her to recognize that she’s just as narcissistic as my father, but in a completely different way. My father is the classic narcissist–he doesn’t care about others and only sees them as useful to him or an extension of himself (family). He has no core, and I would posit that he doesn’t even love himself. That’s part of the reason he’s been so unhappy all his life–he needs constant reassurance that he is great and the second the accolades do not come flowing his way, he’s upset.

He cannot stand being alone. It’s as if he does not exist without others around to affirm him. My parents are currently 83 (my father) and 80 (my mother). My mother has been dancing attendance to my father since they were married 55 years ago. It’s only gotten worse since they’ve aged and my father has gotten


Continue Reading

Accepting family dysfunction is not a one time thing

Many things have changed  in the past three months, though not externally. You may not be able to see it with the naked eye, but I can definitely feel it. To put it bluntly, it’s my family. Before I ended up in the hospital, I had reached an uneasy truce with my parents. My mom called once every three or four weeks and we talked for a half hour, mostly about my father because that’s all she ever wants to talk about. Then I talked to my father for up to ten minutes, hoping he wouldn’t say something incredibly foul that I had to ignore with difficulty or confront with no hope of any positive results.

My mom would email me when she needed something, mainly editing, but other than that, I wouldn’t have any interaction with them, which was exactly how I liked it. When I woke up in the hospital and saw their faces, my heart sank. It was immediate and instinctual, though I hid it from them as I had years of training in not showing my emotions on my face. I can do it most of the time except when I’m really tired. Then, it’s really difficult for me to keep my emotions under control.

I have said more than once that the physical recovery from my medical trauma was relatively easy. The stamina took some time to recover, but other than that, there wasn’t much else I needed to worry about. The minor things that were wrong with me went away on their own. I do have a numb/tingling patch on my right thigh, but I’m not too worried about it. What I’m more worried about is the family. Well, worried is not the word for it. I’m resigned to the dysfunction, but it wore me down and was an obstacle to my recovery.

Someone on Twitter said that the worst thing about family abuse was that you always hoped it would get better–even after the abuser died. He was so right and it stuck with me. My last therapist said something similar in that she commented how my mother would never be the mother I wanted her to be so I had to accept her for the mother she was. It stung, but it’s what I needed to hear.

Side note: Here’s the funny thing (funny meanly bitterly ironic) about the family dysfunction–nobody thinks my father can change. My mother wants a miracle to make him not him (and she points out that I was a miracle in being alive, which, while true, is no reason to think she’s going to get another miracle concerning my father), but we all know he’s been like this for his whole life, which is 82 years. He’s not changing. So any discussion the other three of us have about him (or two if it’s my brother and me) is predicated on that knowledge. He’s a narcissistic, thin-skinned, overly-sensitive, unrepentant asshole who is also misogynistic, racist, and would be homophobic if he had to acknowledge that queer people existed. There is very little redeeming about him and we all know that.


Continue Reading

Taking People at Their Word

I ran across the video below last night as I was surfing YouTube. It was on my YouTube front page as a recommendation, and as my friend, Ian, has met and interviewed Dee Snider (which he, Ian, was in the army. he said Dee was a good dude), I clicked on it.

It hit me in the gut, and I cried while watching it at the rawness and the emotion. I shared it, then tweeted to Dee Snider my respect. He did it to help fund research for childhood cancer, and that’s an admirable thing.

Then I found out that Dee Snider was friends with this president, and I experienced a ‘what the fuck’ moment.  I Googled it and found out it was true. They became friends when Dee Snider was on The Celebrity Apprentice twice a few years back.  I  found out in the context of this president asking to use this song on the campaign trail, and Dee said sure. He said they were friends because they followed the adage to not talk about politics, religion, or sports (which, by the way, is not a luxury everyone has. Politics is not compartmentalized for many minorities, but another post, another day). When Dee started hearing this president on the campaign trail, he was confused because what the president was espousing wasn’t what he believed in, and more to the point, went against what the song is about. As he said, the first line is about the right to choose, which he elaborated meant a woman’s right to choose. So he asked this president to stop using the song because he didn’t want people thinking he (Dee) endorsed the hateful ideas he (the president) was spewing, and the president agreed. Dee talked about when Paul Ryan tried to use it and was flabbergasted the latter didn’t vet it. Dee:

I had to step up and say, ‘Wait a minute. Didn’t you vet the song? You’re singing the song, ‘We’ve got the right to choose’,’ and then railing against women’s right to choose. So I can’t endorse you using it.’ And that’s where I draw the line.

This was in June of last year, and Dee said he still liked this president, but couldn’t get behind him. Dee also sounded like he was struggling because he knew the president as pro-choice and a Democrat. That’s valid because this president has been all over the map, agreeing with the last person to present an argument he likes.
Continue Reading